On 7 July 2016 at 17:55, Clayton Coleman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 7 July 2016 at 17:36, Pete Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hardy, Lala and the rest of the ADB team are going to investigate this >> > over the next few weeks (whether we can replace the ADB infra with >> > minishift). >> > >> > For the product version it must be based on something that we >> > productise (which currently is RHEL or Atomic AFAIK) - doing it on top >> > of something like Alpine is not an option. >> >> You can see what it's built from at >> https://hub.docker.com/r/boot2docker/boot2docker/~/dockerfile/ . Don't >> worry about the FROM debian:jessie - that's just to create the builder >> image. You can see the minimal stuff it's actually installing in the >> final ISO. >> >> > >> > I would also worry about having a radically different upstream from >> > the product version, as I think this can cause bugs, but I'll leave >> > this one to the team to figure out :-) >> > >> > I've also asked Ian a few times if we can try to build smaller images >> > - something to keep trying for ;-) >> >> I don't see why we couldn't have the equivalent of boot2docker.iso >> image that minikube uses: basically a kernel & docker.... that's it. >> Sure we can use a RHEL/CentOS kernel, right? Just please not the whole >> RHEL install ;) > > > Agreed. I think Pete and I are just saying that we need to make an effort > to fix the actual problem (we don't have a small ISO for RHEL/CentOS that > represents our strengths in containers), and that we should also be taking > those steps in parallel.
Exactly. I also still don't understand why we don't ship Atomic Host as the default OS in the container runtime portion of the CDK - this seems like an obvious thing to do . _______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
