On 07/07/2016 10:25 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 7 July 2016 at 17:36, Pete Muir <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hardy, Lala and the rest of the ADB team are going to
investigate this
> over the next few weeks (whether we can replace the ADB infra with
> minishift).
>
> For the product version it must be based on something that we
> productise (which currently is RHEL or Atomic AFAIK) - doing it
on top
> of something like Alpine is not an option.
You can see what it's built from at
https://hub.docker.com/r/boot2docker/boot2docker/~/dockerfile/
<https://hub.docker.com/r/boot2docker/boot2docker/%7E/dockerfile/>
. Don't
worry about the FROM debian:jessie - that's just to create the builder
image. You can see the minimal stuff it's actually installing in the
final ISO.
>
> I would also worry about having a radically different upstream from
> the product version, as I think this can cause bugs, but I'll leave
> this one to the team to figure out :-)
>
> I've also asked Ian a few times if we can try to build smaller
images
> - something to keep trying for ;-)
I don't see why we couldn't have the equivalent of boot2docker.iso
image that minikube uses: basically a kernel & docker.... that's it.
Sure we can use a RHEL/CentOS kernel, right? Just please not the whole
RHEL install ;)
Agreed. I think Pete and I are just saying that we need to make an
effort to fix the actual problem (we don't have a small ISO for
RHEL/CentOS that represents our strengths in containers), and that we
should also be taking those steps in parallel.
Hi Clayton,
I have not tried minishift or "oc cluster up" yet . So I am little
confused at this point. Not sure if these two methods competes with each
other or not. What is your opinion on this?
Thanks,
Lala
_______________________________________________
Devtools mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
