To All: This is the kind of "knownothing" analysis that is being generated by the World Bank report. Declan's listserv is read by many thought leaders and his analysis will contribute to the general misunderstanding and misinformation about the Digital Divide. Your comments should be addressed to him directly at the Politech email address.

Chuck Sherwood

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Politech] World Bank report questions size of "digital divide" [econ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:04:11 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: politech@politechbot.com




I've never completely understood the term "digital divide." Perhaps it's mere parochialism: I live in Washington, DC and have access to DSL and cable modem connections and can purchase a T1 line.

But I don't think so -- the real problem is the term "digital divide" itself. Any such "divide" is necessarily a subset of an economic divide. I have access to technological resources because the U.S. and its peer nations have stable governments, functioning court systems, not-entirely-insane tax rates, functioning bank systems, and pay some attention to property rights. That encourages investment, both domestic and foreign, and fosters an environment that lets a middle class grow and communications providers prosper.

What I just described is not the situation in many parts of the world, especially Africa and perhaps portions of Latin America, that are the most vocal in demanding "Digital Solidarity Funds" paid for by tax dollars in countries that have made more sane economic choices. (This is not an accident of geography. In the early 1900s, Argentina was an economic powerhouse. Now its citizens are understandably leery of bank accounts and credit cards, thanks to past government thievery.)

A recent UPI column describes the problems confronting Latin America today, thanks in large part to politicans' poor economic choices:
http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050211-033722-6932r.htm


In other words, it's a bit silly to talk about the "digital divide" without also addressing the underlying problems of broken court systems, military rule, confiscatory government policies, and so on that these nations have yet to address. Solving those problems would go a long way to solving any "digital divide" that still remains.

But it's always easier to beg for a handout.

-Declan

---

The summary:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?storyID=7731166
GENEVA (Reuters) - The "digital divide" between rich and poor nations is narrowing fast, the World Bank said on Thursday, calling into question a costly United Nations campaign to bring hi-tech telecommunications to the developing world...
Poorer countries, particularly from Africa, are expected to repeat calls in Geneva Friday for a "Digital Solidarity Fund" to help finance the infrastructure they say is needed to close the perceived technology gap...


The World Bank report itself:
http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/ict/resources.nsf/InfoResources/04C3CE1B933921A585256FB60051B8F5
All of this evidence suggests that, at least in terms of access to basic infrastructure, the digital divide is rapidly closing. Many fewer people around the world have no access at all to ICTs, and people in the developing world are getting more access at an incredible rate—far faster than they got access to new technologies in the past, and far faster than developing countries are adding telephone lines today.
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)



_______________________________________________ DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.

Reply via email to