Walter Bright wrote: > ... > > o pdf renders a lot better than html. Why that should be, I don't know, > but it is obviously better.
I could be the old Mac "feature". From what I recall, Apple is fanatical about the on-screen display of something matching, as closely as possible, the on-page display. This means that when they render text, they render it without adjusting the glyphs to fit the pixel grid. This tends to lead to slightly blurrier text on-screen. Since PDF is for print output, it probably does the same thing. Firefox would be using the system text libraries which fit glyphs to a pixel grid, and often don't antialias at low point sizes. > ... > > o Of course I miss the D source code highlighting that Ddoc does. You should be able to copy+paste HTML with its formatting in-tact. > o Impress doesn't seem to be able to do tables. Bummer. I know that 3.0 does. Just don't use too many of them, or Impress will start coughing up blood. > ... -- Daniel
