superdan Wrote:
> == Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
> > Is there some other reason to use structs besides copy construction?
> > -Steve
>
> memory management n shit. with a struct u can use refcounting n malloc n
> realloc n
> shit. still stays a reference type. nothing gets fucked up.
This is not necessary with purely memory-based constructs -- the GC is your
friend. The custom allocator ability in dcollections should provide plenty of
freedom for memory allocation schemes.
>
> den there's all that null ref shit. with a class u have
>
> void foo(container!shit poo)
> {
> poo.addElement(Shit(diarrhea));
> }
>
> dat works with struct but don't work with motherfucking classes. u need to
> write.
>
> void foo(container!shit poo)
> {
> if (!poo) poo = new container!shit; // fuck dat shit
> poo.addElement(Shit(diarrhea));
> }
>
> u feel me?
It doesn't work. Just with your example, you won't get what you expect. Try
it with AA's.
Even your class example doesn't make any sense.
-Steve
