"Zach the Mystic" <reachminusthiszachgm...@dot.com> wrote in message news:duefgfqidzxwcfvge...@forum.dlang.org... > On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 01:38:43 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote: >> >> You should check, but I think isBit is dead code anyway. > > I think it is. I've left a number of dead codes because it helped me > understand the whole system better. There's a lot of isXXX() functions > which come in handy, so maybe isBit will too. I have no reason to cut it > until I fully understand that it's not going to be useful.
It's a relic from when 'bit' was a basic type in D. I removed a bunch of bit-related stuff about six months ago but missed this one.
