On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 05:05:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Zach the Mystic" <reachminusthiszachgm...@dot.com> wrote in
message
news:duefgfqidzxwcfvge...@forum.dlang.org...
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 01:38:43 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
You should check, but I think isBit is dead code anyway.
I think it is. I've left a number of dead codes because it
helped me understand the whole system better. There's a lot of
isXXX() functions which come in handy, so maybe isBit will
too. I have no reason to cut it until I fully understand that
it's not going to be useful.
It's a relic from when 'bit' was a basic type in D. I removed
a bunch of
bit-related stuff about six months ago but missed this one.
Okay, great. Now I DO fully understand that it's not going to be
useful. Thanks for the info I couldn't possibly have known
without consulting someone whose been here much longer than I!
