On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:21:48 -0700 Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 8/12/2012 10:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > Even still, it's a far cry to compare ditching 16-bit with > > (effectively) shunning 32-bit. Yes, 64-bit is bocoming more and more > > important, and yes, 32-bit is becoming less and less important, but > > I still think you're very much jumping the gun here. > > > We'll see. It has already happened on OSX. > Whaddya kidding me? That's an Apple product. Apple only makes disposable throw-away devices. "Release it. Kill it off after 2 weeks. Let the sheep shower us with more of their money. Repeat until there's no more hipster morons with money." There's "Apple" and then there's "the rest of reality".
