On Monday, August 13, 2012 02:51:30 Walter Bright wrote: > 64 bits is far more important. We don't have arrows for every target, we > have to pick the juiciest ones.
I have no idea how much mork work it is to add 32-bit COFF on top of adding 64-bit COFF, and I'm totally fine with just targeting 64-bit COFF for now. I'm just pointing out that there's a definite cost to not having 32-bit COFF support on Windows, whereas your posts seem to imply that you don't think that it's important at all. - Jonathan M Davis
