On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 20:06:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2017 12:28 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
Personally, making contracts less verbose and more powerful is
much higher on my list
We did discuss bouncing the DIP back with a request to revamp
it as a complete overhaul of the contract syntax, but decided
that this DIP was about resolving a simple and immediate
problem, and it shouldn't be held up on that basis.
There's currently a proposal in the PR queue to enhance the
contract syntax.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/66
