On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 12:57:06 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 24.02.19 11:46, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter provided feedback on Razvan's implementation. When it
reached a state with which he was satisfied, he gave the green
light for acceptance.
Sounds like it might be a "worst acceptable proposal" [1] which
Andrei says the DIP process is supposed to avoid.
[1] https://forum.dlang.org/post/q2ndr8$15gm$1...@digitalmars.com
If I'm understanding correctly, Andrei said that about the
proposals, while Walter gave feedback on the implementation,
which is a little different.
But yeah, the proposal was clearly fast-tracked, probably because
it's needed for reference counting and better C++ integration.
