On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:25 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Thanks for letting me know you're abandoning the rvalue ref DIP.
It's not an "rvalue ref" DIP (which I think has confused a lot of people), it's an rvalue *by-ref* DIP. In my head, an "rvalue ref" DIP is something completely different, useful for implementing move semantics of mismatching types. Are you talking about my DIP or that other thing? > I had held off > working on it because I didn't want to duplicate efforts; we're short-staffed > enough as it is. 'abandoning's a strong word, but I don't have motivation to work on it right now. Please, be my guest!