On Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 20:59:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Many replies to you, Steven:
https://digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Discussion_Thread_DIP_1028--Make_safe_the_Default--Final_Review_336354.html
I did not ignore you. I just didn't agree.
One concern here is that these responses are scattered across
different parts of a long discussion thread. So it probably
would be a good idea for the acceptance to be accompanied by an
explanation of what the major objections were to the DIP, and why
they were discounted.
It's not so different from the way that, at the end of a talk or
presentation, it's a good idea to recap the key points that have
already been covered.
