Re: Rationale for accepting DIP 1028 as is

[Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 13:50:25 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 10:46:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

[...]

You continue to miss the point.

Additionally, there never was any "working legacy code". As established, the pre 1080 compiler would have rejected the code. Does-not-compile != working-code.

pre 1028 compiler