On Saturday, 19 November 2022 at 03:14:18 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2022 at 03:08:05 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
It likely already does something, in that- >'it allows for
change to occur without having to break the clients
interface'.
That too is the 'point' missing from that rant.
With all due respect, I think your point is mostly invalid due
to the point that Dukc made.
keep programming/maintaining and enhancing production-level
code for the next 10 years.
then you too will know the correct answer to your question :-)
I think because of uniform function call syntax, getters/setters
are not needed even for production level code, in D of course. In
Java, you do need them so your point holds true in that scenario,
but in D I don't really see the point after giving it some
thought, I would say they are code bloat.
