On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:45:47 -0400, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On Monday 11 July 2011 08:17:50 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Hm... I didn't know about that switch, I thought warnings were enabled
with -w and that made them errors.
I suppose you could stick this in there.
By default, warnings are completely disabled. -w enables them and makes
the
errors. So, it's more like telling it to add more errors than to enable
warnings. -wi enables them, but it leaves them as warnings. They're then
"informational" (basically, -wi makes warnings work like they do with
pretty
much every other compiler on the planet). IIRC, people kept bugging
Walter
about how warnings work with dmd, so he added -wi.
eh... then I retract my statement. I thought the set of -wi warnings
could be different than the set of -w errors.
This is not always an error, I don't think you should need a cast for
things like this.
-Steve
