On Thursday, 14 June 2012 at 13:33:43 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Thursday, 14 June 2012 at 13:31:01 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Thursday, 14 June 2012 at 13:21:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
If you want that and have it immutable you need to make a
deep copy of the passed in object to be safe. You could use
const instead and also making the argument const. If an
argument is const you can pass both mutable and immutable
values, and const of course.
Thanks, I'll try that.
But then I will have problems sharing such data structures with
different threads, correct?
Convenience of usage would be less important than compiler
guarantees, so it looks like I have to stick to immutable, not
const.
