On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 17:17:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This is obviously a mistake in the bitfield implementation.
What else could be concluded from the error message:
std\bitmanip.d(76): Error: shift by 32 is outside the range
0..31
Requesting a 32 bit or 64 bit member on the other hand is not a
mistake, and it is not useless, therefore the analogy breaks
down.
Well curiously it was easier to fix than I thought (a line for a
static if, and a modification of the masking)... Was there any
other bugs that come to mind? Anything of consequence?
