On 31-Jul-12 22:21, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 17:17:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This is obviously a mistake in the bitfield implementation. What else
could be concluded from the error message:
std\bitmanip.d(76): Error: shift by 32 is outside the range 0..31
Requesting a 32 bit or 64 bit member on the other hand is not a
mistake, and it is not useless, therefore the analogy breaks down.
Well curiously it was easier to fix than I thought (a line for a
static if, and a modification of the masking)... Was there any other
bugs that come to mind? Anything of consequence?
Great to see things moving. Could you please do a separate pull for
bitfields it should get merged easier and it seems like a small but
important bugfix.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
