On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34:50 Johannes Pfau wrote: > But it should be possible.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be possible. I'm just pointing out that it wouldn't really be useful. You have to build at least two versions of your library anyway (one with -unittest and one without), so being forced to build your library as a binary for unit tests really isn't a big deal IMHO. But I have no problem with it working to link in a library built with -unittest and have its unit tests run. - Jonathan M Davis
