On 2012-09-20 13:14, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:34:50 Johannes Pfau wrote:
But it should be possible.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be possible. I'm just pointing out that it
wouldn't really be useful. You have to build at least two versions of your
library anyway (one with -unittest and one without), so being forced to build
your library as a binary for unit tests really isn't a big deal IMHO. But I
have no problem with it working to link in a library built with -unittest and
have its unit tests run.
You'll most likely have a release and debug version anyway. Just put the
unit tests in the debug version.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
