Sure, but alloca has the same ugly interface as malloc. :/
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve FG
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve monarch_dodra
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve monarch_dodra
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Mike Parker
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve monarch_dodra
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Era Scarecrow
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve bearophile
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Namespace
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve bearophile
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve Era Scarecrow
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve bearophile
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve - alloca Nick Treleaven
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve - alloca Nick Treleaven
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve - alloca monarch_dodra
- Re: new T[size] vs .reserve - alloca Namespace
