On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 06:14:16 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 23:26:20 UTC, ed wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 15:20:36 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
DFL is just a thin wrapper around Win32, no surprise. I've
found my apps written using DFL work quite fine in Linux via
Wine, so I use them from both OSes.
In Linux?The exe was compiled in win32?
Don't play jokes on it.
He's not joking, it is via wine.
As for the DFL/DWT,GTK-d,TKd comparison you need to compare
apples with apples.
If you can improve DFL widgets so they:
1. support linux, windows, mac
2. support the same features as the "more complex" GUI widgets
With the constraint that:
3. DFL uses less LOC and reduces code complexity comapred to
GTK-d and DWT
Then the comparison between DFL and other GUI libraries would
be interesting.
Cheers,
ed
Don't you want to look for the DFL's author Christopher E.
Miller?
'DFL is Copyright (C) 2004-2010 Christopher E. Miller'
Not particularly as I am not that interested in DFL. But you can
work on DFL without the author, i.e. make improvements, port to
Linux or whatever you wish.
http://dsource.org/projects/dfl/browser/trunk/win32/dfl/license.txt
The DFL library is under a 3-choice license, pick one that suits
you: LGPL, ZLIB, DFL license.
Then go code :)
Cheers,
ed