On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:06:50 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > Clearly, the above is not an issue, but at the moment, the code treats > having a ctor and having a dtor as the same thing. How to fix it? I'm > not exactly sure, you need to have the modules sorted according to ctor > and also according to dtor. The runtime is supposed to run dtors in > reverse order from ctor calls, and I think we should not break that. But > there is definitely room to allow for reordering when ctors are not > affected. > > I'll have to think about it some more.
maybe do simply the thing you wrote, and have two independent lists. or, strictly saying, four independent lists: for shared ctors, for static ctors, for static dtors, for shared dtors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
