On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 19:29:37 UTC, sigod wrote:
Hi, everyone.
```
import std.typecons : Nullable;
class Test {}
Nullable!Test test;
assert(test.isNull);
```
Why does `Nullable` allowed to be used with reference types
(e.g. classes)?
P.S. I have experience with C#, where `Nullable<T>` cannot be
used with reference types. And it sounds logical to me.
It does feel wrong but there is another feature of Nullable where
you can define the value of null. Which might be handy in some
cases where you don't want a reference type to actually be null?
I don't know if this is the case but it may be useful.
