On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 06:10:38 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 17/08/2015 5:57 p.m., Ozan wrote:
Hi
[...]
import std.stdio;
abstract class Family { void greeting(); }
class Dad : Family { void greeting() { writeln("I'm dad"); } }
class Boy : Family { void greeting() { writeln("I'm daddy's
boy"); } }
void main() {
Family dad = new Dad;
Family boy = new Boy;
dad.greeting;
boy.greeting;
}
I'm confused how this isn't real OOP?
Replace 'real' with 'theoretical' OOP. Every instance of a class
(object) is like an independent black box. Every public message
(method / function) of the class definition could be called when
ever you want. Variables are like pointers to objects. With
inheritance and overriding you're losing in class type
implementations of OOP a lot of 'theoretical' flexibility. I was
asking for a possibility to avoid this.
Regards Ozan
