On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:43:03 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 17:05:42 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:51:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 15:05:54 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
The forum-index http header report:

Server:nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)

People check out stuff like that.

Yeah, and that's an industry-standard production deployment.

But perhaps we should just change the server line for the people who do look at it. No need to change the deployment, just the apache/nginx config to spit out something different.

I can picture the article now:

The D programming language maintains its own web framework called vibe.d, but the official website dlang.org doesn't use it. Instead they use the Apache framework written in C. They also decided to modify Apache to make it look like their own vibe.d framework. Apparently tricking people into thinking they use their own code was easier the actually using it.

Mike's call for help was about actively _improving_ dlang.org by pointing out

- what is (or could be) confusing for newcomers
- bad written texts
- missing examples
- not user-friendly parts of the documentation
- missing info
- ...

Basically everything that could stop someone from having awesome first five minutes with D!

Great points to make dlang.org more welcoming. Where it is now is much further ahead then years past.

I read your post but I don't think we in any disagreement. I think everyone can agree that it would look better to others if dlang.org used it's own web framework. Whether or not it makes sense to actually implement it is another question. Since I'm not intimately familiar with the internals of dlang.org, or the consequences of switching, I don't assert that either way would be better. I am, however, pointing out that there are going to be poeple trying to share the D language in a negative light, and dlang.org not using vibe is exactly the kind of thing these people will feed off of and possibly use to turn off others from the language.

Reply via email to