BCS wrote:
Why use this:
"func(someInt) { |a,b| return a+b; };"
when you can reuse syntax and get this for the same amount of typeing
"func(someInt) (a,b){ return a+b; };"
While I know the compiler could (should) know the difference easily
enough, my eyes want to parse that as a chained call followed bizarrely
by a naked block, rather than a block.
That said, I've always found blocks to be one of Ruby's niftiest
features (I do a fair bit of Ruby hackage on the side), and would love
to see something like it in D2.
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
