Reply to Yigal,
Personally I prefer to have syntax for "blocks" like Ruby/smalltalk.
given the following example function:
int func(int a, delegate int(int) dg) { .. }
// call func with [something in this spirit is my favorite]:
func(someInt) { | int a, int b | return a+b; };
how about require that the block arg in the called function name the args
int func(int a, delegate int(int val, int thing) dg) { .. }
and then pull in those names implicitly
func(someInt) { return val+thing; };
This would have implication in overloading and what not but it would be syntactically
clean.
