Walter Bright Wrote: > Georg Wrede wrote: > > D's loss seems unbelievable. D now has a 0.628% share, which is even > > less than what it's lost (-0.82%) in the last 12 months. What could be > > the reasons for it? Is it even possible to figure out any reason?? > > Of course it's unbelievable. This change didn't happen over a year's > time, it happened in one month. This means that the methodology Tiobe > uses changed, or the search portals changed their hit count algorithm. > > Notice > http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/tpci_definition.htm > where they automatically discount all D hits by 10%. They don't do that > for C. > > For example, of the first 100 hits of "D programming" on google, I found > only 6 that were not about D, two of which was already excluded by > Tiobe's algorithm. That's 4%, not 10%. > > I found 3 non-C ones for "C programming" in the first 100. That's 3%, > not 0%.
i sorta prefer grau douche zone's theory. makes no sense 'cept in da framework where he's a retarded dumbass & evil to boot. but u gotta respect the man. he's waited so patiently fer dis opportunity to suck collective cock. gotta give it 2 da man.