On Friday, 30 November 2012 at 15:08:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 11/30/12 4:49 AM, 1100110 wrote:
Andrei's support is also necessary, IIRC he is one of main
person behind
phobos. A stable version of D is not useful without a stable
version of
phobos and druntime to go with it.
I'm very supportive of a serious, meaningful initiative.
My perception is that we're having growing pains - our process
is lagging behind the participation in the project and the
attention it receives. If Walter and I do not acknowledge that
in time and act swiftly on it, we're heading toward a crisis in
the community much, much larger and dangerous than the D1/D2
schism.
The thing is that I don't see that succeed as an external project.
This is like we wanted both vegetarian and non vegetarian food,
and reached that goal by cooking everything all together and then
some people spent their time to separate the meat from the rest.
Most likely they'll get bored rapidly as it is a lot of boring
work, that is useless if the process don't mix everything in the
first place.
