On Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 03:16:36 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
On 11/30/2012 09:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/30/12 4:49 AM, 1100110 wrote:
Andrei's support is also necessary, IIRC he is one of main
person behind
phobos. A stable version of D is not useful without a stable
version of
phobos and druntime to go with it.
I'm very supportive of a serious, meaningful initiative.
My perception is that we're having growing pains - our process
is
lagging behind the participation in the project and the
attention it
receives. If Walter and I do not acknowledge that in time and
act
swiftly on it, we're heading toward a crisis in the community
much, much
larger and dangerous than the D1/D2 schism.
Andrei
I know, I feel the same way.
The alienation will be between those who want to see D continue
to evolve, vs those who want to see D cast in stone from any
further breaking changes.
Example, check out the madness being argued in this thread ...
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/sdcmmiqtlcfrfgvmw...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
This kind of clashing will only get worse unless something is
done about it.
--rt
