On 3 December 2012 02:26, 1100110 <0b1100...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/30/2012 09:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> On 11/30/12 4:49 AM, 1100110 wrote: >>> >>> Andrei's support is also necessary, IIRC he is one of main person behind >>> phobos. A stable version of D is not useful without a stable version of >>> phobos and druntime to go with it. >> >> >> I'm very supportive of a serious, meaningful initiative. >> >> My perception is that we're having growing pains - our process is >> lagging behind the participation in the project and the attention it >> receives. If Walter and I do not acknowledge that in time and act >> swiftly on it, we're heading toward a crisis in the community much, much >> larger and dangerous than the D1/D2 schism. >> >> >> Andrei > > > Andrei, How would you organize this? > > If the process is lagging behind, what can be done to get it up-to-speed?
Isn't lagging behind the point of stable? ;-) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';