On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:16:11 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 01:26:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/13/2012 5:10 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Remedy adopting D
Saying that would be premature and incorrect at the moment. We
still have to ensure that Remedy wins with D. This is an
ongoing thing.
Yes, but what H.S. Theoh wrote about the desperate need of
process is still true and correct. Like many others here, I
think it's the biggest problem with D right now for its
adoption. I for one will never consider using D for my main
line of work without a true STABLE branch: a branch you can
rely on. And yet I'm pretty sold to the language, but when your
project is at stake, what you need is security. And the current
development scheme doesn't provide that.
Yeah, but if people doesn't help to define a new process, no
process will ever be defined.
We are trying to do something like that, any support or ideas
will be helpful. The community needs to help to define this, and
Walter already said that he will agree on what the community
defines.
See:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Release_Process
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ka5rv5$2k60$1...@digitalmars.com
