On 14 December 2012 21:28, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: > On Friday, December 14, 2012 09:34:50 PM Timon Gehr wrote: >> On 12/14/2012 08:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> > On 2012-12-14 01:19, Walter Bright wrote: >> >> It was the D community that selected the @(attribute) syntax, and the >> >> overall design was based on extensive public discussion threads here >> >> about it. >> > >> > And you still implemented the [attribute] syntax first. >> >> It is my understanding that the public discussion deciding in favour of >> @(attribute) was started after [attribute] had already been implemented. > > Yes. But I believe that pretty much every other discussion on it prior to it > actually being implemented discussed using parens and not brackets. > > - Jonathan M Davis
Wasn't the last discussion on it over a year ago? (Prior to it actually being implemented). -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';