On 12/16/12 6:15 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/15/2012 09:39 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Can we drop the LTS name ? It reminds me of ubuntu, and I clearly hope
that
people promoting that idea don't plan to reproduce ubuntu's scheme :
- it is not suitable for a programming language (as stated 3 time now,
so just
read before why I won't repeat it).
- ubuntu is notoriously unstable.
Call them "stable release cycles" if you like, which is what they are
intended to be.
Just one tidbit of information: I talked to Walter and we want to build
into the process the ability to modify any particular release. (One
possibility is to do so as part of paid support for large corporate
users.) That means there needs to be one branch per release.
Andrei
