On Tuesday, 15 January 2013 at 19:11:43 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
It'd be nicer if we could use an operator, but this is wishful thinking:

auto r = r2.jumpTo( d2 ); //r2d2, yes.
Equivalent to:
auto r = r2[ d2 .. $ ];
Or:
auto r = r2[ d2 ... ];

Again, wishful thinking.

What about startOn instead?

That makes two additional primitives and one additional range type( -Bidirectional + Reversible + StartableOn??!?!??!?!?!)

Reply via email to