On Tuesday, 15 January 2013 at 19:11:43 UTC, Phil Lavoie wrote:
It'd be nicer if we could use an operator, but this is wishful thinking:auto r = r2.jumpTo( d2 ); //r2d2, yes. Equivalent to: auto r = r2[ d2 .. $ ]; Or: auto r = r2[ d2 ... ]; Again, wishful thinking.
What about startOn instead?That makes two additional primitives and one additional range type( -Bidirectional + Reversible + StartableOn??!?!??!?!?!)