On 1/15/13 4:22 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:59:17PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/15/13 2:07 PM, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Continuing with reversible ranges:
I don't think .reverse will take us far enough. Won't work with
arrays which kinda puts a monkey wrench into everything.
[...]
Not really. We can define an array wrapper with a .reverse that returns
the original array
Yah, there's retro already. My point is .reverse is not powerful enough.
From what I can tell .before is.
Andrei
