On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 21:54:21 UTC, Michael wrote:
On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 21:03:04 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
Let's face it: there are *no* objective criteria for
determining whether a mutator should be a function or property
setter.
Yes, but also it's should be a lightweight action (main idea).
I think we need something more measurable than lightweight-ness
to justify a language feature.
As proposal:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/ydcjggoibjmuuoobg...@forum.dlang.org
And C# Property notes
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/w86s7x04.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/x9fsa0sw.aspx
and quote
At all, it looks like C# style in D Way.
--no-parenthesis for current behaviour for non-property
functions.
