On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 at 13:44:39 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/6/13, Rob T <al...@ucora.com> wrote:
Actually I had meant this instead, which reduces duplication
class A
{
}
class A.B
{
// implementation
}
I don't like this idea at all. It again makes the class
unreadable
because you can't tell at a glance what it contains.
I suppose you are right, but I wouldn't want to break up a class
except for defining a separate interface from the implementation
specifics, so I would expect that anything not in the interface
must be implementation details, which means it should not show up
in the interface.
If I understood you correctly, what you want to accomplish is
different from defining an interface. You want to be able to
break up a class into smaller parts to save on indentations?
--rt
