With credit for inspiration to David Medlock in this post--
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/d9lnrr$26q3$1...@digitaldaemon.com ...
// Tongue firmly in cheek, I'd like to introduce
// the NAPAPISS principle: (with apologies to SFINAE and RAII)
// NAPAPISS = NAmed Parameters Are simply Passed in a Struct,
Silly.
// Yes, indeed, maybe this is what happens after drinking too
much of
// the fine wine products from the Napa valley... you start having
// wild flights of fancy of how D might surprisingly soon have
// named parameters....
import std.stdio;
import std.c.stdlib;
void main(string[] arg) {
// this works today: but with the drawback that the
// named params must be known at compile time...
// Here is a named param call,
// as compact as I could get it (see struct below for actual
definition).
auto a = myfunc!q{ z= 2; x = -123; y = 200 }(0)(); // calls
opCall
writeln("a=", a); // prints "a=yo", as returned from opCall
// And here's the runtime version, unfortunately you have to
// pre-declare g because otherwise it won't survive the
scope, and
// the return value from myfunc.opCall would become
inaccessible.
string g;
with(myfunc!()(0)) {
x=rand() % 40;
y=x/2;
z=y/2;
g = call(); // as a side effect, prints 'X 7, Y 3, Z 1'
}
writeln("g=", g); // prints "g=yo", as returned from opCall
/*
// The bright future: this demonstrates that
// it would be fairly trivial to make some kind of annotation
// like @kwarg or whaterver, to indicate that a function
// was using this calling convention:
@kwarg string f(int a, string b) { body; }
// so that @kwarg function definitions are lowered to:
struct f_kw {
int a;
string b;
string f() { body; }
}
// and calls to @kwarg functions are transformed
// from this:
auto r = f(a=5, b="good");
// into this:
f_kw tmp34;
tmp34.a = 5;
tmp34.b = "good";
auto r = tmp34.f();
// the benefit: named parameters can be used in a natural way,
// and they need be known only at runtime.
*/
}
// how the 'works today' above examples were implemented:
struct myfunc(string init_string="")
{
// named keyword or named parameters
// --the call arguments and their defaults
int x=0;
int y=0;
int z=0;
this(int) {}
string opCall() {
mixin(init_string ~ ";");
writefln("X %s, Y %s, Z %s", x, y, z );
return "yo";
}
alias opCall call;
}
On Friday, 22 March 2013 at 09:18:33 UTC, J wrote:
The bigger point here is more profound: it is trivial to
implement named parameters using structs + trivial lowerings,
and this is no way conflicts with function overloading.
D deserves to have named parameters to functions -- it makes
for much more legible code, and obviates the need for slow
builder patterns. Readable and speedable. It's win-win.
