Am Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:52:11 +0200 schrieb "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <pub...@kyllingen.net>:
> On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 05:54:39 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad > wrote: > > The following is a message posted by Johannes Pfau to the other > > (pre-)review thread which didn't seem to get noticed, along > > with an edited version of my reply. > > > > On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 13:14:52 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> > >> Reposted from github: > >> I think it would be nice if the high level functions would > >> also allow > >> using custom environment variables. So the execute and > >> executeShell > >> functions should have overloads which accept a string[string] > >> with > >> environment variables (and probably accept a Config as well). > >> > >> The execute and executeShell functions would be trivial to > >> implement > >> though if pipeProcess / pipeShell had an overload with > >> environment > >> and Config parameters. So it's probably more important that > >> pipeProcess / pipeShell get these overloads. > > I have implemented this now. I think this was a great > improvement. pipeProcess(/-Shell) and execute(Shell) now wield > more of the power of spawnProcess(/-Shell) without complicating > their usage. > > Please comment. > > Lars Thanks! Looks good to me :-)
