On May 5, 2013 3:30 PM, "David Nadlinger" <s...@klickverbot.at> wrote: > > On Sunday, 5 May 2013 at 13:33:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> 13. LDC makes some more arbitrary changes to which the reason for the change has been forgotten. Get on it David! :o) > > > This applies only to a small part of the changes. The larger share of them will actually need adaption of the upstream frontend sources for a very good reason if we want to have a truly shared codebase. > > As for the size of the diff, don't forget that LDC doesn't enjoy the luxury of having IN_LLVM sections in the upstream source – the difference in amount of changes actually isn't that large: > > --- > $ fgrep -rI IN_GCC dmd/src | wc -l > 49 > > $ fgrep -rI IN_LLVM ldc/dmd2 | wc -l > 57 > --- > > David
Indeed, but I was thinking of changes that aren't ifdef 'd. I'm sure I saw a few... Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';