On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 15:51:26 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 15:16:29 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Iain Buclaw" <ibuc...@ubuntu.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1201.1368284962.4724.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Actually, the more I sit down and think about it, the more I
question
whether or not it is a good idea for the D D front end to
have a dependency
on phobos. Maybe I should stop thinking in general. :)
Yeah, the compiler can't depend on phobos.
Why?
If we keep a "must compile with several past versions" policy
anyway, what would make Phobos special?
David
It prevent the use of newer feature of D in phobos.
