On Thu, 28 May 2009 11:52:20 -0400, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:42 +0400, BCS <n...@anon.com> wrote:
Hello Steven,
fails to compile due to the perceived circular dependency, even though
none exists.
IIRC it compiles, but fails as soon as you run it.
-Steve
Which is even worse. Walter stated that "silently generating bad code"
(i.e. code that doesn't work) is a top priority bug.
I wonder why this design flaw isn't fixed for so long...
It's not so silent. The code deterministically fails every time you run
it. When was the last time you published a compiled program that you
never tested, even once? ;)
BCS, thanks for pointing that out. I forgot about that.
-Steve
