On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:42 +0400, BCS <n...@anon.com> wrote: > Hello Steven, > >> fails to compile due to the perceived circular dependency, even though >> none exists. > > IIRC it compiles, but fails as soon as you run it. > >> -Steve >> > >
Which is even worse. Walter stated that "silently generating bad code" (i.e. code that doesn't work) is a top priority bug. I wonder why this design flaw isn't fixed for so long...
