Hello Denis,
On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:42 +0400, BCS <n...@anon.com> wrote:
Hello Steven,
fails to compile due to the perceived circular dependency, even
though none exists.
IIRC it compiles, but fails as soon as you run it.
-Steve
Which is even worse. Walter stated that "silently generating bad code"
(i.e. code that doesn't work) is a top priority bug.
I wonder why this design flaw isn't fixed for so long...
It's not silent. It fails loudly, reliably and immediately. The only way
it can slip thought is if you don't even TRY to run the exe before you ship.
