On Thursday, May 30, 2013 19:44:17 Maxim Fomin wrote: > I was looking for explanation why after years of stable array > definition one article abolish official spec (without changing > it) and major implementation without any Walter or Andrei > approval. I got an answer in previous comment but found it > unsatisfactory: simply because somebody considers that D > definitions contradict to some external notions is not a reason > to change it. There are other places in D which do not correspond > with names in other languages or with general terms. Also, there > is as much opinions, as much people, so moving language toward > some external definition is a problematic task. > > It would be good if Walter or Andrei comment on this.
Then you'll probably need to start a new thread on it. They're unlikely to see any of this (let alone comment on it) if they haven't already been involved in the thread, and I don't think that either of them have said anything in this thread. - Jonathan M Davis