Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
yigal chripun wrote:
the difference is in the UI (which a wiki doesn't provide) and the
format used, i.e. not some wiki format.
38 out of 57 of the wikis presented on the Wikipedia comparison page
(*) are listed as having a stable WYSIWYG editor (some of the others are
listed as having an alpha or beta one)...
Jerome
(*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software
if these wikies provide a wysiwyg editor than what's the point of not
using the standard HTML format as the backend?
