On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Yigal Chripun wrote: > J?r?me M. Berger wrote: > > yigal chripun wrote: > > > the difference is in the UI (which a wiki doesn't provide) and the format > > > used, i.e. not some wiki format. > > > > > 38 out of 57 of the wikis presented on the Wikipedia comparison page (*) > > are listed as having a stable WYSIWYG editor (some of the others are listed > > as having an alpha or beta one)... > > > > Jerome > > > > (*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software > > if these wikies provide a wysiwyg editor than what's the point of not using > the standard HTML format as the backend?
In an attempt to help this thread end... Thanks, the bicycle shed is a nice pretty new color and doesn't need any more paint. Sigh, Brad (Why is it that people can't stick to the original question and avoid the 100% pointless side discussion? No, really, don't answer that)
